Re: PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain

Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain
Date: 9 Jan 1997 15:28:26 GMT

In article <[email protected]> Martin Alak writes:
> Are you saying that when a large planet enters the solar system,
> its net gravitational effects on the orbit of any particular planet
> is zero (i.e. the orbital path is unchanged from what if would
> have been in the absence of the incoming planet) or are you
> saying that the orbital velocity is unchanged, meaning that the
> orbital path itself could change? Since there could be confusion
> between the two some readers may be incorrectly reading the
> wrong scenario.
> Martin Alak <[email protected]>

The Zetas are saying that BECAUSE planets return to their pre-perturbation orbits, this PROVES that SOMETHING ELSE is at play. Humans just look the other way when they return, but the Zetas have offered an explaination, the sweeping arm from the Sun and the repulsion force. Yes there is a perturbation, but this is not permanent. They want me to pluck some text from their Perturbation topic that addresses your confusion.

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Human astrophysics has two discomfiting notions they use as guides in this situation. They can't put these notions together, so like two passengers in the back seat of a car who can't talk to each other, they stare out opposite windows and pretend the other doesn't exist.

1. The first notion is that the orbit of planets is due to a state of equilibrium between the gravity pull of the sun and an original straight-line forward motion of the planet which got caught in the gravity of the sun to the extent that it is in a perpetual tug of war between this gravity pull and its momentum on the original path. The fact that, almost invariably, all the planets orbit in the same direction is presumed to be due to the original path of the planets being conveniently all in the same direction. Conveniently, that is, for the notion.
2. The second notion describes another phenomenon that is also visible and measurable to humans - perturbations. Perturbations are known to man as they can observe and record the actions of two planets passing each other in their orbits. The smaller one will speed up upon approach to the larger, due to the gravity tug between the two, and after passing will slow down in a comparable manner, lingering as it were. The larger planet has also been perturbed, and however slightly has slowed to meet the approaching smaller planet and likewise will try to tag along with the exiting smaller planet. If neither planet were in motion, it could be argued that the speed of the orbits should net out so they are returned to the same point. Both planet orbits have also altered in their shapes, but as this challenges the first human notion it is never addressed.

...

More than the speed of the orbit is affected when orbiting planets perturb each other, the shape of the orbits is also affected. Given a smaller planet passing on an inside track and orbiting at a faster speed, the smaller planet will pull outward toward the larger during passage. Thus, its orbit has been changed, as for a period of time it is tracking along in a wider curve, at a greater distance from its sun. According to the human explanation for orbits - that they represent an equilibrium between the planets forward motion and the gravity tug from the sun such that the forward motion has been bent into a curve, and that the equilibrium is maintained by centrifugal force caused by the continuing tug of the forward motion - this new orbit shape should be maintainable with no need for the planet to return to its pre-perturbation state.

We have asserted that the equilibrium of orbits is maintained by a combination of not only the gravity tug from the sun but also by the repulsion force that has been generated between the planet and its sun, and the planets being swept ahead of rotating energy fields thrown out from the sun like long sweeping arms. That the perturbed planets return to their pre-perturbation state is in line with our explanation, not the human explanation for orbits.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])
All rights reserved: [email protected]
http://www.zetatalk.com