link to Home Page

Re: RETROGRADE ORBITS - the Zetas Explain


Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: RETROGRADE ORBITS - the Zetas Explain
Date: 11 Jan 1997 20:08:40 GMT

In article <[email protected]>
> Um, why then don't all the planets have the same length year,
> mathcing the rotation rate of the "sweeping arm"? Why doesn't
> this "sweeping field" continuously pump energy into the orbits
> and cause all the planets to spiral outward, destroying the
> solar system?
> [email protected] (Greg Neill)

Well Greg, this is not a PHYSICAL arm, like yours. Its more akin to the Solar Wind. Get it?

In article <[email protected]>
> So, it's supposedly approaching from below the ecliptic. It could
> hardly be seen as 'stationary' as the Earth whizzes around in the
> ecliptic plane; there would inevitably be a noticeable shift against
> the background stars, a huge one with such a close object.
> [email protected] (Greg Neill)

For those who know what to look for, NOT the bright pinpoint of light that a star exhibits, it's visible now, yes. The Zetas have described this as a magnitude 2.0 object, blurry redish and the same glow throughout, such that it would look like the last gasp of a dying star having nova'd. Some instructions given to an astronomer who asked, wanting to locate its motion with repeated imagine, is as follows:

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
However, if filmed, the setup should include objects to magnitude 10, then passed through a RED FILTER, else the equipment, which is calibrated for the bright light of stars, will not register the 12th Planet. A month will pass before its motion can be detected by repeated images.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])

In article <[email protected]>
> Surely, now that it's 1997, right in the midst of your 1995
> through 1998 prediction, the 12th planet would be manifestly
> observable? Surely its gravitational influence would already
> be noted amongst other bodies in the solar system?
> [email protected] (Greg Neill)

Right. Oceans heating up by couple degrees so that the oceans world wide are 6" higher on the beaches (since heat rises, this is NOT from global warming). Magnetic diffusion. Slowing rotation. Wild weather. Leaps in the number of deep (550-650 KM) earthquakes since mid 1980's.

Where you been?