Article: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected](Nancy )
Subject: Re: Orbital Elements for the 12th Planet
Date: 2 Feb 1997 02:21:51 GMT
In article <[email protected]> Paul Campbell
states:
> So now your straight line path that you've been shouting
about
> is curved is it? Need I remind you that in several places
you
> stated that the incoming 12th planet is heading straight at
us
> until it approaches "passage". ... Or how about
the drawing
> you have at
>
> http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword03g.htm
>
> That shows the path of the 12th planet as seen from the side
of
> the solar system. During the outer reaches of your diagram
you
> show a straight line up until it gets close to the solar
system.
> Furthermore that line is 11 degrees below the ecliptic.
Having
> concluded that you've unambiguously established that the
12th
> planet is right now heading at us in a straight line, are
you now
> changing your story so that it is on a curved line? If so
you are
> seriously contradicting yourself. If not you haven't
answered my
> question of why, on your path drawing, are we forced to look
near
> the ecliptic during the period of 1998 to 2001 when we
should
> be looking 11 degrees south of the ecliptic?
> [email protected] ()
Paul, essentially straight and as close to a straight line as 9999999999 something or 1.000000000 something are the same damn thing! It wiggles around a bit as it approaches the Solar System, but when moving between foci, on that long haul, essentially straight. Perhaps this chart will clean things up:
Time Period | Angle South | Orbit | Constellation |
8/1996 | 11 degrees | normal | left of Orion's shoulder |
12/1997 | 6 degrees | normal | left of Orion's hand |
1998-99 | 1 degrees | retrograde | left to right over Orion |
3/2003 | 5 degrees | retrograde | in Taurus |
pre-passage | 32 degrees | retrograde | right of Orion |