Re: Planet X/12th Planet Retrograde Orbit

Article: <[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: Planet X/12th Planet Retrograde Orbit
Date: 10 Apr 1998 23:13:24 GMT

In article <[email protected]> Paul Campbell
writes:
> Um just to make sure, is this the same Nancy who claimed that 
> Comet Hale-Bopp was fake? 

Still the same old dis-info artists I see.  Hey Paul!  Ever bother to
check up on your facts before you mutter them.  Using you technique, to
take something out of context, I could say your response to the subject
titled Retrograde Orbit, where you say "Quite a remarkable sight" means
you AGREE that a retrograde orbit exists!  Hey, Paul, glad to have you
on board. (Oh, did I quote you out of context?  Tisk!) 

Here's the summary of what the Zetas said on Hale-Bopp, when they said
it, with the exact wording as a link for each dated summary.  This is
When they said it, What it was they were describing, and the Gist of
what they said.  You can find the whole at
http://www.zetatalk.com/poleshft/p46.htm


.......
August 6, 1995		a nova
Hale-Bopp is nothing more than a distant star, and will draw no closer.
 The 12th Planet, a true messenger of death, will not even get the
attention the fraudulent Hale-Bopp is getting today.  That's because
it's a real threat, not a diversion.  

August 14, 1995		a nova
Why has Hale-Bopp, at this time, decided to fragment and explode,
growing in brightness?  This is decidedly not the pattern that comets
present, but it is the pattern of exploding stars, super novas, which
become for a brief time visible, and then wink out.  

August 17, 1995		a nova
Outbursts occur when comets fragment on nearing the Sun, being of a
composition that cannot withstand the exposure.  The 1993 outburst
story stands directly at odds with the orbital computation, which
places Hale-Bopp, so the story goes, in a regular orbit around the Sun
every 4,000 years or so!  

August 29, 1995		a nova
The diffuse brightness of an exploding star provides a fairly large
area of bright points, as the mass of the star spirals outward with
fiercely burning portions away from the star center, which is dimming. 
Just which of those little pin points is considered the so-called comet
head?  

September 26, 1995		a nova
No comet emissions have been discerned except by an Arizona friend of
Hale's.  These tentative emissions hardly weigh against La Silla's
study, which is authoritative.  Why did La Silla call Hale-Bopp an
"unusual" comet, with a broad area of a supposed dust cloud not usually
found surrounding a comet.  

October 19, 1995		Sagitarrius unmapped stars
This unfortunate conspiracy began with the best of intentions at the
bequest of MJ12, in fact, who had neglected to update their lackeys on
the latest.  The conspirators were going under the prior directives,
which were to focus attention away from the pending reentry of the 12th
Planet into your Solar System.  

October 25, 1995		Sagitarrius unmapped stars
The public has been given many images of Hale-Bopp, all with slightly
different backgrounds, as the light range was adjusted each time to
allow or screen out certain spectrums.  Thus, it appears from the
photos that Hale-Bopp must be moving.  

November 29, 1995		Sagitarrius unmapped stars
A late summer ESO report stated as clearly as the ESO dared that
Hale-Bopp was not a comet, based on the lack of comet emissions and
expansive behavior.  They did not publish the many concurrent findings
that demonstrated that Hale-Bopp is an exploding star.

May 18, 1996			star clusters or black space
Why did the various major observatories around the world assume the
head of Hale-Bopp to be various different things - a dark area, a
bright spot, a dark areas to the side of a bright spot - all while the
head was the basis of the supposed orbit tracking?  Why was it
necessary for the IAU to toss out 90% of the data submitted to it for
the announced orbit to be found to be correct?  Is this science, that
the assumption overrules the data?


June 17, 1996			real comet #1
Take a check on where all these almost daily changes in the ephemerides
are leading, astronomers of the world, as they are leading right to
where a face saving comet that's a real comet is coming from.  They
plan to hide Hale-Bopp behind a real comet.  What comet, ever, has had
this kind of manipulation in its orbit?  

July 9, 199]			real comet #1
All roads seem to lead to Gamma Andromedae, where this does not
logically follow!  They would marry their fraud, Hale-Bopp, with a
double star, Gamma Andromedae, and what a glorious perihelion that
would be!  This required manipulation of the orbit such that it moved
away from Jupiter, rather than being perturbed toward the giant!

November 16, 1996		behind the Sun
Hoagland's early conclusion that what NASA was calling Hale-Bopp was an
object under intelligent control gave the conspirators a way out. 
Those who have spread this gossip are all firmly in the palm of the
conspirators, cooperating.  

November 24, 1996		behind the Sun
We predict that the single individual, the NASA Principal Investigator
who has been given exclusive rights to Hubble pictures of Hale-Bopp,
will come forward and grant the public a look at these prizes. 
However, these pictures will be of times long past.

December 1, 1996		behind the Sun
It zigs and zags without any astronomical reason, perturbing away form
Jupiter, having its turnaround at perihelion tightening, all
unexplained by the orbit plotters.  Along the way they have also lined
their fraud up with star clusters and when the orbit was in the comet
belt, with faint peripheral comets that JPL and NASA spied with their
equipment.

January 20, 1997		real comet #2
Is it not supposed to be a glorious panorama across the sky at this
point? Is it not to take the breath of the beholder away at this point?
The comet of the millennium? A comet of such massive proportions that
it was outbursting out past Jupiter?

March 5, 1997		real comet #2
It is not what was advertised and pointed to in 1995.  It is not what
folks were advised to track through Sagittarius in late 1995.  It is
not what folks were struggling to see in early 1996, nor the brief
alignment of a comet in June-July of 1996.  It is not the many star
clusters that the Hale-Bopp orbit was aligned with during its twists
and turns that broke all the rules of Orbital Elements and have never
been explained by JPL.  And it will prove not to be what has been
billed for Hale-Bopp at perihelion.  Imagine what you might see with
the Hubble, above the atmosphere which clouds mankind's view of his
Solar System.  Imagine what information is received by the NEAT
program. Comets are so many gnats in the sky that NASA and JPL fail to
report as they are forbidden to take advantage of their superior view
in this matter.

March 27, 1997		real comet #2
The tale told by the angle of the two tails, the ion tail in particular
as it points away from the Sun, shows that this comet is not at the
distance claimed by the conspirators.  What angle should that tail
pointing away from Earth be?  Is it at that angle?  Here's the rub!  Is
this a big comet far away or a small comet much closer!  

April 2, 1997			real comet #2
The single clue available to the populace is the angle of the tail
which points directly away from the Sun.  As we have explained, drawing
a simple diagram as viewed from well above the Solar System and placing
a comet in this or that position relative to the Earth and Sun will
quickly show that the comet cannot be at the distance claimed!