Re: Planet X/Nibiru/Destroyer comet during the Exodus

In Article <[email protected]> Ben Ede wrote:
> If we agree with the Zetas that some minor asteroid
> might have attained an orbit which would periodically
> bring it back to our earth (as related by Velikovsky
> regarding Venus and Mars) during the era 1,500 - 600
> BC), how do the Zetas explain the natural disasters
> that our globe experienced at several occasions during
> the timespan 776 Bc - 687 BC ( see Worlds in Collision
> by Immanuel Velikovsky)

Indeed, very good questions, Ben.  I read Velikovsky too, and was taken
by what he described as the "52 year round", where some cultures
ANTICIPATED periodic disasters.

In Article <[email protected]> Ben Ede wrote:
> Rome was founded during the 7th century BC.  At the
> time of Romulus death (Romulus was the founder of Rome),
> it was reported that "Both the poles shook, and Atlas
> shifted the burden of the sky.....The sun vanished, and
> the rising clouds obscured the heaven....the sky was
> riven by shooting flames.  ...
> After this era there were calendar reforms in all major
> ancient cultures.  I would be interested in the Zetas
> explanation .. the reason behind those calendar reforms?

    What happens after a major earthquake?  Aftershocks,
    and some of these not mild.  Can you immagine life
    after a wrenching pole shift, where the ocean rifts
    have been ripped apart to the extent that the oceans
    of the world dropped in sea level some 16-20 feet,
    worldwide?  What happens to cause aftershocks,
    which we are STILL experiencing from the last pole
    shift?  After a pole shift, the plates come to rest, but
    there are inequities where pressure is constant against
    this or that point, the weight of one plate pressing
    against another, or pressing to move in a direction.
    They are restless in this regard, a LONG way from
    quiescence.  They are held together by friction along
    the plate edged, or where they lay atop one another in
    the case of subducting plates.  As any engineer will
    tell you, bridges and skyscrapers and that expensive
    new car you purchased will last only so long.  There
    is wear and tear, stress fractures, changes in the
    chemistry of supporting structures over time, and
    finally - SNAP!  When a snap, or earthquake, occurs,
    the plates move to a new position, and once again the
    process starts.

    Beyond aftershocks, there is the effect of what is
    termed Near Earth Asteroids, dragged into the
    vicinity of Earth by a close passage of Planet X,
    where they follow the planet as it comes through the
    Asteroid Belt and then get pulled into some sort of
    orbit that includes Earth.  Objects, viewed form Earth,
    are relative in size, in that a distant Mars can appear
    tiny but a close asteroid can loom large.  Meteors are
    described as shooting stars, or flaming objects streaking
    across the skies on their way to a thud on the ground,
    somewhere.  It is not in the RECENT documentation
    of man that larger objects have fallen to Earth, but
    those events were recorded after the last pole shift, as
    Velikovsky has documented.  Since the greater part
    of Earth is water, and many places are virtually
    uninhabited in vast deserts or the frozen wastelands
    of the poles, the likelihood of a large object dropping
    near a civilized and populated area is slight.  Such
    a disaster happening even in a slightly populated
    locale would wipe out all witnesses closeby, leaving
    only those at some distance as witnesses.

    Space shuttles and satellites put up by man regularly
    flame upon re-entry, so heat from the friction against
    increasing atmospheric pressure is obviously a factor.
    Lightning occurs during simple thundershowers due
    likewise to friction, where the electronic charge
    between air masses becomes different and is adjusted.
    Why would such lightning not occur during the fall of
    a minor asteroid to Earth?  Is friction and heat and all
    the electronic repercussions that come from that in the
    atmosphere not present, as they are during
    thunderstorms?  What are the plate impacts that occur
    when a minor asteroid does NOT burn up completely,
    upon falling to Earth?  If an earthquake can result in
    many aftershocks, is this not a shock?  Are nearby
    volcanoes subject to pressure on the lava beneath them
    not activated?  A thud on a plate results in immediate
    pressure from ABOVE on the plate, which has an
    immediate effect upon any volcanoes subject to lava
    pressure from BELOW on that plate.  The pressure
    on the plate likewise changes the dynamics on the
    tenuous plate edges, so that quakes from this source
    occur too, along with the aftershocks.

    This is what Velikovsky documented, in the very
    true reports from several centuries after the last shift.
    The forthcoming pole shift in 2003 is less likely to
    invoke minor asteroid passages of this sort, but as
    the core will shift farther without being drawn into
    an immediate alignment jerk, it will change the
    geographic in a more radical fashion.  In addition,
    the sloshing of the oceans will create greater flood
    tides than the prior shift.  Thus, this pole shift is
    anticipated to have a greater impact, and die-off, than
    the prior.
         ZetaTalk™