Re: I Spoke to Nancy Online and all I got was this Lousy T-Shirt!
In Article <[email protected]> Greg Neill
wrote:
> 5. Besides her supposed Planet X, Nancy claims that
> the Sun has a companion Sun at the "other focus"
> of the Planet X orbit. Ignoring for the moment that
> such an orbit could not be stable, she claims that
> after "passage" Planet X will slow and turn around
> due to the combined gravitational influence of the
> Sun and this companion "lining up". She claims
> that the companion's gravity is "dominant". Since
> the companion is at a distance of some 18 times the
> distance of Pluto, in order for its gravity to be
> just equal to that of the Sun at a distance of, say,
> 1AU, it would have to have a mass of over 55,000
> times that of the Sun. That's a black hole candidate.
> Besides the fact that a black hole of such mass at
> this distance would be exceedingly bright across the
> spectrum due to accretion disk activity, how is it we
> don't notice the resulting approximately 27 year
> orbital period of the Sun about this companion that
> would result?
The orbit not stable according to Newton’s laws, which can’t even be
applied to our Moon, so much for their accuracy and being all
encompassing. Who said the Sun’s dead twin was LARGER than the Sun?
Not ZetaTalk, but this doesn’t stop you from running merrily down the
path to a Black Hole. You made that leap from your understanding of
some statement made where the dead twin is “dominant” during the
turnaround? Quote please, as what ZetaTalk has said is below. And
you’re making the assumption that all binaries must DANCE. If they have
come to a standstill because the draw on them from all direction is such
that this is the equilibrium, then they would not. Below, what the Zetas
have said about the Sun’s dead twin and Planet X turnaround.
The Earth and the dark star that is the second foci of
[Planet X]'s orbit do not rotate around each other any
more than the planets in your Solar System rotate
around each other. The reason for the latter is that the
Sun dominates the planets, and their influence on
each other becomes the lesser voice. In like manner
your Sun and this dark star, of a comparable size, are
caught in a larger net and are essentially motionless
within your Galaxy. This net exists for all the stars
in your Galaxy, as elsewhere, and is the reason the
stars in the sky do not lose their position and float
toward each other. It is not that they are so far apart
that they do not influence each other. Influence,
however slight, is always there. It is rather that
influences have been balanced to where an
equilibrium is reached.
ZetaTalk™, Second Foci
[Planet X]'s path is elliptical, making a long flat
circle around its two gravitational masters, your
Sun and a body you cannot see. The Sun's alter ego
in this matter is not an object on your sky maps, but
for the purposes of calculating [Planet X]'s orbit,
you can assume it be have the same mass as the Sun,
and to be at a distance that allows the curve of the
ellipse to smooth to an essentially straight line
between the two orbital foci. [Planet X]'s travels
are not unlike a train on parallel tracks, where the
train is on one side of the tracks going in one
direction, and on the other side coming back. It
will surprise you to know that the second foci is
not that far away. Since it rivals the Sun in mass,
the assumption would be that your astronomers
would know about it. However, being dark, they
stare past it and think it space. To use multiples
of the distance from your Sun to its farthest known
orbiting planet, which you call Pluto, this foci is
from the Sun 18.724 times as far away. ... Having
passed by the Sun, [Planet X] now slows. The rate
of slowing is dependent on two factors, essentially -
its speed and the fact that both its gravitational
masters are now behind it. As fast as [Planet X]
picked up speed approaching your Sun, it slows
even faster, the nearness of your Sun behind it
no small factor in this.
ZetaTalk™, Comet Orbit
