Planet X: the JIM (let-them-drown) SCOTTI Object [3]
In thread Re: Planet X: Why Sarah Mac FAILS
In Article: <[email protected]> Jim Scotti wrote:
> If your fictitious object orbits the sun every 3600
> years as you've stated, it can't get farther than about
> 470 astronomical units from the sun which means it
> should never get fainter than 20th magnitude if it is as
> you describe it.
Is this why the IRAS team, in 1983, had to go ABOVE
the atmosphere to get a peek? Couldn't see it well
enough from the observatories on Earth? Couldn't
see it without infrared equipment? Because it would
be SO VISIBLE TO AMATEURS?
ZetaTalk
From existing ZetaTalk:
Planet X does exist, and it is [Sitchin's] 12th Planet,
one and the same. When first sighted via infrared
readings and reported by the IRAS team in 1983, the
IRAS findings were taken in many ways by the human
scientists reading the reports, and thus they cast
many interpretations on just what [Planet X]'s infrared
reading might imply. Infrared heat can be taken to
mean many things, depending on distance, size, and
composition of the object being sensed. A very hot
object far away can be comparable to a barely warm
object near at hand, or a very large object far away
can be considered to be a smaller object close at
hand, and as the compression caused by the mass of
an object is considered to produce infrared rays, then
a very heavy but cold object could be considered
comparable to a lighter but warmer object. The
scientists reading the IRAS findings took ... Planet X,
to be larger, colder, and farther away, as the mind
does not want to comprehend the alternatives. When
first sighted in 1983, it was on the right hand side of
Orion, as viewed from your northern hemisphere. It
will first move left and up toward the elliptical plane
as it nears the Earth's Solar System for its passage,
as though to assume a place with the other planets
in the Solar System, at this point being slightly to the
left of Orion. In 1998 it will veer right, moving toward
Taurus and Aries, assuming a retrograde orbit, and
will come up through the plane as viewed from above
the elliptical plane, in its first passage.
ZetaTalk, Planet X
(http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s58.htm)
Path as Viewed from Earth
(http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword03h.htm)
And the infamous Dec 31, 1983 Washington Post FRONT PAGE article!
Washington Post
Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered
31-Dec-1983
A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet
Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would
be part of this solar system has been found in the
direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting
telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical
satellite. So mysterious is the object that astronomers
do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby
"protostar" that never got hot enough to become a
star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the
process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so
shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its
stars ever gets through. "All I can tell you is that we
don't know what it is," Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS
chief scientist for California's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory and director of the Palomar Observatory
for the California Institute of Technology said in an
interview. The most fascinating explanation of this
mystery body, which is so cold it casts no light and
has never been seen by optical telescopes on Earth
or in space, is that it is a giant gaseous planet, as
large as Jupiter and as close to Earth as 50 billion
miles. While that may seem like a great distance in
earthbound terms, it is a stone's throw in
cosmological terms, so close in fact that it would be
the nearest heavenly body to Earth beyond the
outermost planet Pluto. "If it is really that close, it
would be a part of our solar system," said Dr. James
Houck of Cornell University's Center for Radio
Physics and Space Research and a member of the
IRAS science team. "If it is that close, I don't know
how the world's planetary scientists would even
begin to classify it." The mystery body was seen
twice by the infrared satellite as it scanned the
northern sky from last January to November, when
the satellite ran out of the supercold helium that
allowed its telescope to see the coldest bodies in
the heavens. The second observation took place
six months after the first and suggested the
mystery body had not moved from its spot in the
sky near the western edge of the constellation
Orion in that time. "This suggests it's not a comet
because a comet would not be as large as the one
we've observed and a comet would probably have
moved," Houck said. "A planet may have moved
if it were as close as 50 billion miles but it could
still be a more distant planet and not have moved
in six months time.
(http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword26c.htm)